[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <531900F4.5090805@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 18:12:52 -0500
From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Kieran Clancy <clancy.kieran@...il.com>
CC: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Li Guang <lig.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>,
Juan Manuel Cabo <juanmanuel.cabo@...il.com>,
Dennis Jansen <dennis.jansen@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI / EC: Clear stale EC events on Samsung systems
On 03/06/2014 07:32 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, March 06, 2014 11:54:28 AM Kieran Clancy wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>>> On Thursday, March 06, 2014 11:04:14 AM Kieran Clancy wrote:
>>>> Rafael, is it a separate process to get this in the stable tree or
>>>> will it naturally happen after being merged into the mainline?
>>> I need to add a proper "CC stable" tag to your patch for this to happen.
>>>
>>> Which -stable kernels should it go to?
>> 3.2 and 3.10 seem like natural choices (3.4?), but I don't know the
>> norm for this kind of fix. Would there be any reason not to include it
>> in some particular stable kernels?
> In some cases patches are not needed in older -stable, because the
> changes are not relevant there etc.
>
> OK, I'll mark if for all applicable -stable series.
>
> Thanks!
>
Thanks, Rafael!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists