linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: Add message transfer tracepoints for SMBUS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:13:55 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	wolfram@...-dreams.de, khali@...ux-fr.org,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: Add message transfer tracepoints for SMBUS

David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:

> > Can we have something like this for 'flags'?
> 
> There's a __print_flags() which should work.  One thing I'm concerned about
> there is how do we handle more flags being added - does that count as an ABI
> break if the printed format changes?
> 
> SMBus flags are basically the same as I2C flags, right?

Hmmm... __print_flags() seems to append a string if a flag is set, and doesn't
if it isn't set.  It places a separator between each string.  I would prefer
something that emits a single char per flag or a dash if it isn't present.
Are you okay with that?

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/