[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMhs6YzPcTnLO2rwny0binzLFT+TNJUwVhintGHYitgJ4=kiaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 22:41:54 +0100
From: "Maxin B. John" <maxin.john@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, andreas.dilger@...el.com,
Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>, alexey.zhuravlev@...el.com,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@...il.com>,
josh@...htriplett.org, jinshan.xiong@...el.com,
"Maxin B. John" <maxin.john@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lustre/mdc_lib: fix possible null pointer dereference
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 09:53:06PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 02:04:35PM +0100, Maxin B. John wrote:
>> > From: "Maxin B. John" <maxin.john@...a.com>
>> >
>> > cppcheck reported possible null pointer dereference in mdc_lib.c
>> >
>> > [lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c:233]: (error) Possible null pointer dereference
>> > : op_data - otherwise it is redundant to check if op_data is null at line 226
>> >
>>
>> There is only one caller and "op_data" is not NULL.
>
> I agree, John, please fix your tools. Or check the result and fix the
> code so that there isn't false-positives (by not checking for NULL at
> all here...)
Thanks to Dan and Greg for the comments. Will try my best to avoid
these kind of mistakes in future.
> thanks,
> greg k-h
Best Regards,
Maxin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists