lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140307143924.GD3153@ghostprotocols.net>
Date:	Fri, 7 Mar 2014 11:39:24 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: PVT Re: [PATCH 07/13] perf hists: Add support for showing relative
 percentage

Em Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 11:37:07AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:14:08AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > When filtering by thread, dso or symbol on TUI it also update total
> > period so that the output shows different result than no filter - the
> > percentage changed to relative to filtered entries only.  Sometimes
> > this is not desired since users might expect same results with filter.
> > 
> > So new filtered_* fields to hists->stats to count them separately.
> > They'll be controlled/used by user later.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/builtin-report.c |  6 ++++++
> >  tools/perf/util/hist.c      | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> >  tools/perf/util/hist.h      |  2 ++
> >  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> > index 5f7f1a332186..3f8478603d51 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> > @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ static int report__add_mem_hist_entry(struct report *rep, struct addr_location *
> >  
> >  	evsel->hists.stats.total_period += cost;
> >  	hists__inc_nr_events(&evsel->hists, PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE);
> > +	if (!he->filtered)
> > +		evsel->hists.stats.nr_filtered_samples++;
> 
> 
> Huh? I read the above as "if not filtered, increment the number of
> filtered samples", isn't this reversed?
> 
> I.e. I understand "filtered" as entries that the filter applied to, so
> will not be considered, and you use this meaning for he->filtered, but
> not for stats_nr_filtered_samples, right?

Since I had to stop here, could you try reworking that other patch to
avoid aligning the \ at the end of the line and renaming the above to
some other name that makes he->filtered match in meaning what
stats_nr_filtered_samples means?

Perhaps stats_nr_non_filtered_samples?
 
> - Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ