linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/7] of: introduce of_dma_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJnG1c0=+UgOmNOGs7a5jv2f3O074-TsXibiHsXapXhcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 6 Mar 2014 21:13:26 -0600
From:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To:	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] of: introduce of_dma_is_coherent() helper

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
<santosh.shilimkar@...com> wrote:
> The of_dma_is_coherent() helper parses the given DT device
> node to see if the "dma-coherent" property is supported and
> returns true or false accordingly.
>
> For the architectures which are fully dma coherent and don't need per device
> property, it can enable CONFIG_ARCH_IS_DMA_COHERENT config option which
> enables DMA coherent for all devices by default.

This worries me. I killed off arch_is_coherent() for arm. Now we're
adding something back. Also, we already have HAVE_GENERIC_DMA_COHERENT
which is different, but the names will be confusing. MIPS also has
DMA_NONCOHERENT.

>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
> ---
>  drivers/of/platform.c       |   31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/of_platform.h |    6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> index 2265a55..bd080db 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> @@ -570,4 +570,35 @@ out:
>         return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_dma_get_range);
> +
> +/**
> + * of_dma_is_coherent - Check if device is coherent
> + * @np:        device node
> + *
> + * It returns true if "dma-coherent" property was found
> + * for this device in DT.
> + */
> +#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_IS_DMA_COHERENT
> +bool of_dma_is_coherent(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +       struct device_node *node = np;
> +
> +       while (node) {

This screams for a for_each_parent_of_node helper.

> +               if (of_property_read_bool(node, "dma-coherent")) {
> +                       of_node_put(node);
> +                       return true;
> +               }
> +               node = of_get_next_parent(node);
> +       }
> +       return false;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_dma_is_coherent);
> +#else
> +inline bool of_dma_is_coherent(struct device_node *np)

This is in the header and should not be here.

> +{
> +       /* ARCH is fully dma coherent and don't need per device control */
> +       return true;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_dma_is_coherent);
> +#endif
>  #endif /* CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS */
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_platform.h b/include/linux/of_platform.h
> index ba7d3dc..48e0748 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_platform.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_platform.h
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ extern int of_platform_populate(struct device_node *root,
>                                 struct device *parent);
>  extern int of_dma_get_range(struct device_node *np, dma_addr_t *dma_addr,
>                                 phys_addr_t *paddr, phys_addr_t *size);
> +extern bool of_dma_is_coherent(struct device_node *np);
>  #else
>  static inline int of_platform_populate(struct device_node *root,
>                                         const struct of_device_id *matches,
> @@ -88,6 +89,11 @@ static inline int of_dma_get_range(struct device_node *np, dma_addr_t *dma_addr,
>  {
>         return -ENODEV;
>  }
> +
> +static inline bool of_dma_is_coherent(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +       return false;
> +}
>  #endif

I don't think you have the ifdefs right here.

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/