linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ath6kl: sdio: fix system panic when doing wifi stress test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87a9d0oqbz.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date:	Sat, 8 Mar 2014 13:57:36 +0200
From:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@....qualcomm.com>
To:	Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>
CC:	Hui Liu <Hui.Liu@...escale.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linville@...driver.com" <linville@...driver.com>,
	"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<ath6kl@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath6kl: sdio: fix system panic when doing wifi stress test

Hi Steffen,

Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de> writes:

>> > Does the patch below help? It would also fix the corruption with
>> > scat_q_depth. Please note that I have only compile tested it. And I might
>> > have also missed something important, so please review it carefully.
>> 
>> Yes, Firstly, I have looked at the asm code and the compiler(gcc 4.8.1) works correctly after applying
>> the following patch. Secondly, I have tested the patch with compiler(gcc 4.8.1) on the real HW, and it
>> works fine too. Without the patch, the kernel crash will happen 100%.
>> 
>> Thus, for the patch:
>> 
>> Acked-by: Jason Liu <r64343@...escale.com>
>> Tested-by: Jason Liu <r64343@...escale.com>

[...]

> What happend with this? If I look in mainline, I don't find it. At
> least the reording of the struct fields looks as if one definitely
> wants to have that.

It seems that I forgot to submit this properly, sorry about that. I did
it now:

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath6kl/2014-March/000000.html

-- 
Kalle Valo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/