lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140308153730.GA27506@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Sat, 8 Mar 2014 16:37:30 +0100
From:	Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>
To:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@....qualcomm.com>
Cc:	Hui Liu <Hui.Liu@...escale.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linville@...driver.com" <linville@...driver.com>,
	"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ath6kl@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath6kl: sdio: fix system panic when doing wifi stress
 test

On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 01:57:36PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
> 
> Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de> writes:
> 
> >> > Does the patch below help? It would also fix the corruption with
> >> > scat_q_depth. Please note that I have only compile tested it. And I might
> >> > have also missed something important, so please review it carefully.
> >> 
> >> Yes, Firstly, I have looked at the asm code and the compiler(gcc 4.8.1) works correctly after applying
> >> the following patch. Secondly, I have tested the patch with compiler(gcc 4.8.1) on the real HW, and it
> >> works fine too. Without the patch, the kernel crash will happen 100%.
> >> 
> >> Thus, for the patch:
> >> 
> >> Acked-by: Jason Liu <r64343@...escale.com>
> >> Tested-by: Jason Liu <r64343@...escale.com>
> 
> [...]
> 
> > What happend with this? If I look in mainline, I don't find it. At
> > least the reording of the struct fields looks as if one definitely
> > wants to have that.
> 
> It seems that I forgot to submit this properly, sorry about that. I did
> it now:
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath6kl/2014-March/000000.html
> 

\o/ Thank you.

Regards,

Steffen

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ