[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7A0C7967F@SW-EX-MBX01.diasemi.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 13:21:02 +0000
From: "Opensource [Steve Twiss]" <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RTC linux <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: RE: [RESEND] [PATCH V1 2/2] rtc: da9063: RTC driver
On 11 March 2014 12:27, Lee Jones wrote:
>Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH V1 2/2] rtc: da9063: RTC driver
>
>> From: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
>>
>> Add the RTC driver for DA9063.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
>> Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
>> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>
>How could I have Acked a patch that I've never seen?
>
><snip>
>
>> The original patch is here:
>> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/6/346
>>
>> This patch resend is identical to the original patch, except it adds
>> the Acked-by: line from Alessandro Zummo, previously provided here:
>> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/7/112
>>
>> Also, it adds an Acked-by line on behalf of Lee Jones, as requested:
>> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/10/369
>
>Ah, no. I meant send the set with my Ack applied to the patch I
>actually reviewed.
Oh, no! I'm sorry about that.
I completely misunderstood.
>
>Alessandro,
> Are you happy for me to take this set through the MFD tree and send
> you a pull-request for an immutable branch?
Alessandro & Lee,
Please accept my apology on this one, I've really messed things up
on this patch set.
Regards,
Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists