linux-kernel - RE: [RESEND] [PATCH V1 2/2] rtc: da9063: RTC driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7A2AF6729@SW-EX-MBX01.diasemi.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:17:45 +0000
From:	"Opensource [Steve Twiss]" <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
CC:	David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	RTC linux <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: RE: [RESEND] [PATCH V1 2/2] rtc: da9063: RTC driver

Hi Alessandro,

Just over a week ago I sent a patch for the rtc: da9063: RTC driver file that
added RTC support for the DA9063 currently in the kernel.

I'm not sure if it may have been missed in your inbox
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/11/230

The RTC patch was previously Acked by you here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/7/112


On 11 March 2014 12:27, Lee Jones wrote:

>Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH V1 2/2] rtc: da9063: RTC driver
>> From: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
>>
>> Add the RTC driver for DA9063.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
>> Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
>> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>
>How could I have Acked a patch that I've never seen?
>
><snip>
>
>> The original patch is here:
>>  - https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/6/346
>>
>> This patch resend is identical to the original patch, except it adds
>> the Acked-by: line from Alessandro Zummo, previously provided here:
>>  - https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/7/112
>>
>> Also, it adds an Acked-by line on behalf of Lee Jones, as requested:
>>  - https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/10/369
>
>Ah, no. I meant send the set with my Ack applied to the patch I
>actually reviewed.
>
>Alessandro,
>  Are you happy for me to take this set through the MFD tree and send
>  you a pull-request for an immutable branch?
>

I believe that I made a mess of the resend and Ack'ed when I shouldn't
have on Lee Jones's behalf -- but then there was a reply from Lee who
suggested that he could take the patch through despite this.
I think that was his intention.
(Lee: I hope I am not stepping outside the line again!)

If you have time to quickly take another look at this, then I would
appreciate that.

Thank you,
Steve