lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:46:56 -0400
From:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
To:	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jmoyer@...hat.com,
	kosaki.motohiro@...il.com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, miaox@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND v2 PATCH 1/2] aio, memory-hotplug: Fix confliction when migrating and accessing ring pages.

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 04:15:33PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> IO ring page migration has been implemented by the following patch:
> 
>         https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/fs/aio.c?id=36bc08cc01709b4a9bb563b35aa530241ddc63e3
> 
> In this patch, ctx->completion_lock is used to prevent other processes
> from accessing the ring page being migrated.
> 
> But in aio_setup_ring(), ioctx_add_table() and aio_read_events_ring(),
> when writing to the ring page, they didn't take ctx->completion_lock.

> As a result, for example, we have the following problem:
...
> As above, the new ring page will not be updated.
> 
> The solution is taking ctx->completion_lock in thread 2, which means,
> in aio_setup_ring(), ioctx_add_table() and aio_read_events_ring() when
> writing to ring pages.

Upon review, there are still two accesses of ->ring_pages that are not 
protected by any spinlocks which could potentially race with migration.  One 
is in aio_setup_ring(), which can be easily resolved by moving the assignment 
of ->ring_pages above the unlock_page().  Another spot is in 
aio_read_events_ring() where head and tail are fetched from the ring without 
any locking.  I also fear we'll be introducing new performance issues with 
all the additonal spinlock bouncing, despite the fact that is only ever 
needed for migration.  I'm going to continue looking into this today and 
will try to send out a followup to this email later.

		-ben
-- 
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists