[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1394650983-24780-7-git-send-email-soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 12:03:00 -0700
From: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
To: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@...inx.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 6/9] tty: xuartps: Don't write IRQ disable register to enable interrupts
A comment states, that, according to the data sheet, to enable
interrupts the disable register should be written, but the enable
register could be left untouched. And it suspsects a HW bug requiring
to write both.
Reviewing the data sheet, these statements seem wrong. Just as one would
expect. Writing to the enable/disable register enables/disables
interrupts.
Hence the misleading comment and needless write to the disable register
are removed from the enable sequence.
Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
---
I added a few lines to comment the change and altered the summary line.
In case this causes issues it should show up a little easier as a
candidate to revert.
Sören
---
drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c b/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
index b182ab8cfd07..f9a2c2fc03c4 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
@@ -1085,11 +1085,7 @@ static void xuartps_console_write(struct console *co, const char *s,
xuartps_writel(ctrl, XUARTPS_CR_OFFSET);
- /* restore interrupt state, it seems like there may be a h/w bug
- * in that the interrupt enable register should not need to be
- * written based on the data sheet
- */
- xuartps_writel(~imr, XUARTPS_IDR_OFFSET);
+ /* restore interrupt state */
xuartps_writel(imr, XUARTPS_IER_OFFSET);
if (locked)
--
1.9.0.1.g4196000
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists