linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] Change ACPI IPMI support to "default y"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1394695475.25122.4.camel@x230>
Date:	Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:24:36 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
To:	"pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>
CC:	"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"minyard@....org" <minyard@....org>,
	"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Change ACPI IPMI support to "default y"

On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 08:22 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2014-03-12 23:22:49, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > No. The power meter driver knows nothing about IPMI. It makes no IPMI
> > calls. There's no requirement that a vendor implement it via IPMI.
> 
> Yet you claim that IMPI is needed for that, and that's why you made
> IMPI default.

I claim that the ACPI spec defines the behaviour of IPMI operation
regions, and so we should default IPMI to Y in order to (by default)
implement the ACPI spec.

> So ... do we need dmi-based blacklist?

I don't see why.

-- 
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>