linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: Schedule NAPI from dealloc thread instead of callback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:17:20 +0000
From:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
To:	Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
CC:	<ian.campbell@...rix.com>, <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jonathan.davies@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: Schedule NAPI from dealloc thread
 instead of callback

On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 09:04:41PM +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> If there are unconsumed requests in the ring, but there isn't enough free
> pending slots, the NAPI instance deschedule itself. As the frontend won't send
> any more interrupts in this case, it is the task of whoever release the pending
> slots to schedule the NAPI instance in this case. Originally it was done in the
> callback, but it's better at the end of the dealloc thread, otherwise there is
> a risk that the NAPI instance just deschedule itself as the dealloc thread
> couldn't release any used slot yet. However, as there are a lot of pending
> packets, NAPI will be scheduled again, and it is very unlikely that the dealloc
> thread can't release enough slots in the meantime.
> 

So this patch restores the property that "only two parties access the
ring", right?

Wei.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/