[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1394707350.25873.34.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:42:30 +0000
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
CC: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jonathan.davies@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: Schedule NAPI from dealloc thread
instead of callback
On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 10:17 +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 09:04:41PM +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> > If there are unconsumed requests in the ring, but there isn't enough free
> > pending slots, the NAPI instance deschedule itself. As the frontend won't send
> > any more interrupts in this case, it is the task of whoever release the pending
> > slots to schedule the NAPI instance in this case. Originally it was done in the
> > callback, but it's better at the end of the dealloc thread, otherwise there is
> > a risk that the NAPI instance just deschedule itself as the dealloc thread
> > couldn't release any used slot yet. However, as there are a lot of pending
> > packets, NAPI will be scheduled again, and it is very unlikely that the dealloc
> > thread can't release enough slots in the meantime.
> >
>
> So this patch restores the property that "only two parties access the
> ring", right?
I think so, and therefore:
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists