[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1394735259.26600.14.camel@pippen.local.home>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:27:39 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
"fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"tim.bird@...ymobile.com" <tim.bird@...ymobile.com>,
"gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com" <gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com>,
"dsaxena@...aro.org" <dsaxena@...aro.org>,
"arndb@...db.de" <arndb@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] arm64: Add ftrace support
On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 17:08 +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * Note:
> > + * No protection against faulting at *parent, which may be seen
> > + * on other archs. It's unlikely on AArch64.
> > + */
> > + old = *parent;
> > + *parent = return_hooker;
>
> return_hook? People might take it personally otherwise ;)
No, return_hooker is consistent with all the other archs. Hey, it's a
rugby position! Note, which I was when I played. ;-)
>
> > + trace.func = self_addr;
>
> in kernel/ftrace/ftrace.c there's an smb_wmb() between setting up
> tracing_graph_pause and setting the ret_stack with a comment saying:
>
> /* Make sure the tasks see the -1 first: */
>
> Why don't we have a corresponding read-barrier here?
The corresponding rmb is in kernel/trace/trace_function_graph
ftrace_push_return_trace().
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists