[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CE95F5CF3B924F0A921DDC3493A67365@realtek.com.tw>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:24:50 +0800
From: hayeswang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To: 'David Miller' <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<nic_swsd@...ltek.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] r8152:addRTL8152_EARLY_AGG_TIMEOUT_SUPER
From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 12:08 PM
[...]
> >> And I fundamentally disagree with this being a Kconfig parameter.
> >>
> >> Make it run-time calculated _or_ settable via ethtool.
> >
> > Excuse me. How should I make it run-time calculated without a
> > Kconfig parameter? Should I use module_param?
>
> You run-time determine the setting based upon the negotiated link
> speed and traffic patterns.
It is difficult to design a algorithm which considers the hardware
of the platform, network traffic, and even the USB behavior to
dynamically modify the setting. I don't think I have the capability
to do it.
Besides, I don't wish to modify the setting by ethtool when re-loading
the driver or rebooting every time.
Excuse me. Why is it not accepted for being a Kconfig parameter.
It let the manufactuers of some platforms, especially the embedded
system, could tune their performance. Should I give up this patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists