[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140314.144311.2001561184461945910.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:43:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hayeswang@...ltek.com
Cc: David.Laight@...LAB.COM, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nic_swsd@...ltek.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2]
r8152:addRTL8152_EARLY_AGG_TIMEOUT_SUPER
From: hayeswang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:24:50 +0800
> Besides, I don't wish to modify the setting by ethtool when re-loading
> the driver or rebooting every time.
You have code to reset the driver, you can do it when the user asks
for the setting to be changed via ethtool. I do not see this as
a problem.
The ethtool change can occur while the driver is already up, you'll
just need to reset the chip and make the new configuration, this is
not a problem.
> Excuse me. Why is it not accepted for being a Kconfig parameter.
> It let the manufactuers of some platforms, especially the embedded
> system, could tune their performance. Should I give up this patch?
We want to discourage such hard-coding, not encourage it.
I think you are limiting yourself unnecessarily by refusing to
consider that there may be ways other than Kconfig to adjust this
setting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists