[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140314120400.4e17c47a@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:04:00 +0000
From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Yoshihiro YUNOMAE <yoshihiro.yunomae.ez@...achi.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Aaron Sierra <asierra@...-inc.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] serial/uart/8250: Add tunable RX interrupt trigger
I/F of FIFO buffers
> @@ -2325,10 +2323,19 @@ serial8250_do_set_termios(struct uart_port *port, struct ktermios *termios,
> if ((baud < 2400 && !up->dma) || fifo_bug) {
> fcr &= ~UART_FCR_TRIGGER_MASK;
> fcr |= UART_FCR_TRIGGER_1;
> + /* Don't use user setting RX trigger */
> + up->fcr = 0;
This breaks
set fcr via sysfs
set baud rate below 2400
set baud rate higher
If baud < 2400 and the user has set a value then probably we should honour
it. If fifo_bug is set then we should never honour it (and should perhaps
eventually error it in the sysfs set).
> +static unsigned char convert_fcr2val(struct uart_8250_port *up,
> + unsigned char fcr)
> +{
> + unsigned char val = 0, trig_raw = fcr & UART_FCR_TRIGGER_MASK;
> +
> + switch (up->port.type) {
> + case PORT_16550A:
> + if (trig_raw == UART_FCR_R_TRIG_00)
> + val = 1;
> + else if (trig_raw == UART_FCR_R_TRIG_01)
> + val = 4;
> + else if (trig_raw == UART_FCR_R_TRIG_10)
> + val = 8;
> + else if (trig_raw == UART_FCR_R_TRIG_11)
> + val = 14;
> + break;
Surely the default case should be returning 1 not 0 ?
> +static int convert_val2rxtrig(struct uart_8250_port *up, unsigned char val)
> +{
> + switch (up->port.type) {
> + case PORT_16550A:
> + if (val == 1)
> + return UART_FCR_R_TRIG_00;
> + else if (val == 4)
> + return UART_FCR_R_TRIG_01;
> + else if (val == 8)
> + return UART_FCR_R_TRIG_10;
> + else if (val == 14)
> + return UART_FCR_R_TRIG_11;
What happens if you specify a meaningless value. Doing exact matching
means that you have to know the hardware exactly. How about
if (val < 4)
return UART_FCR_R_TRIG_00;
else if (val < 8)
return UART_FCR_R_TRIG_01;
else if (val < 14)
return UART_FCR_R_TRIG_10;
else
return UART_FCR_R_TRIG_11;
so you get the nearest lower value that the hardware can provide ?
> + break;
> + default:
> + pr_info("Not support RX-trigger setting for this serial %u\n",
> + up->port.type);
That lets users spew into the logs. I think actually you just want
default:
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
or similar
Otherwise this looks good to me. The interface is sensible, it can be
expanded easily to other devices and device types, and the logic looks
right.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists