[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140317093602.GY27965@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:36:02 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip
tree
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 08:31:24PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in
> kernel/locking/Makefile between commit fb0527bd5ea9 ("locking/mutexes:
> Introduce cancelable MCS lock for adaptive spinning") from the tree and
> commit 4dc0fe493027 ("lglock: map to spinlock when !CONFIG_SMP") from the
> akpm-current tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
I'm a bit sad of not having seen that lglock patch at all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists