[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140319162729.9b9f322b171140548b25c7af@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:27:29 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip
tree
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:36:02 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 08:31:24PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in
> > kernel/locking/Makefile between commit fb0527bd5ea9 ("locking/mutexes:
> > Introduce cancelable MCS lock for adaptive spinning") from the tree and
> > commit 4dc0fe493027 ("lglock: map to spinlock when !CONFIG_SMP") from the
> > akpm-current tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> > is required).
>
> I'm a bit sad of not having seen that lglock patch at all.
Here 'tis:
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Subject: lglock: map to spinlock when !CONFIG_SMP
When the system has only one CPU, lglock is effectively a spinlock; map it
directly to spinlock to eliminate the indirection and duplicate code.
In addition to removing overhead, this drops 1.6k of code with a defconfig
modified to have !CONFIG_SMP, and 1.1k with a minimal config.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/lglock.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
kernel/locking/Makefile | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN include/linux/lglock.h~lglock-map-to-spinlock-when-config_smp include/linux/lglock.h
--- a/include/linux/lglock.h~lglock-map-to-spinlock-when-config_smp
+++ a/include/linux/lglock.h
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/notifier.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
#define LOCKDEP_INIT_MAP lockdep_init_map
#else
@@ -57,4 +59,18 @@ void lg_local_unlock_cpu(struct lglock *
void lg_global_lock(struct lglock *lg);
void lg_global_unlock(struct lglock *lg);
+#else
+/* When !CONFIG_SMP, map lglock to spinlock */
+#define lglock spinlock
+#define DEFINE_LGLOCK(name) DEFINE_SPINLOCK(name)
+#define DEFINE_STATIC_LGLOCK(name) static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(name)
+#define lg_lock_init(lg, name) spin_lock_init(lg)
+#define lg_local_lock spin_lock
+#define lg_local_unlock spin_unlock
+#define lg_local_lock_cpu(lg, cpu) spin_lock(lg)
+#define lg_local_unlock_cpu(lg, cpu) spin_unlock(lg)
+#define lg_global_lock spin_lock
+#define lg_global_unlock spin_unlock
+#endif
+
#endif
diff -puN kernel/locking/Makefile~lglock-map-to-spinlock-when-config_smp kernel/locking/Makefile
--- a/kernel/locking/Makefile~lglock-map-to-spinlock-when-config_smp
+++ a/kernel/locking/Makefile
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-obj-y += mutex.o semaphore.o rwsem.o lglock.o mcs_spinlock.o
+obj-y += mutex.o semaphore.o rwsem.o mcs_spinlock.o
ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
CFLAGS_REMOVE_lockdep.o = -pg
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_PROC_FS),y)
obj-$(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) += lockdep_proc.o
endif
obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += spinlock.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += lglock.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) += spinlock.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES) += rtmutex.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES) += rtmutex-debug.o
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists