[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <532825D9.4050708@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:24:17 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com"
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: davinci: fix gpio selection for OF
Hi Alexander,
On Tuesday 18 March 2014 03:15 PM, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 18.03.2014 09:37, schrieb Sekhar Nori:
>
>> It is safe - at the least it does not break anything that is already
>> working. I guess the decision to put it into -rc depends on whether you
>> consider out of tree dtbs to be a valid usecase for the kernel.
>
> That's all DT is about, getting rid of the necessity for in-tree
> hw-descriptions. ;)
>
> But I don't need any rush here, I'm just unable to understand why the
> -rc phase isn't used for bug fixing as I believe that's what this phase
> is for.
The push back you are seeing is because this is pretty late in -rc
cycle. If this push back was not there the bug fix cycle would probably
never close.
In all probability, if this was -rc2 or even -rc3 there would not be so
much discussion.
Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists