[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140318123418.GH13200@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:34:19 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"matt.fleming@...el.com" <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
"msalter@...hat.com" <msalter@...hat.com>,
"roy.franz@...aro.org" <roy.franz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/15] arm64: add EFI runtime services
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:47:06PM +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
[...]
> +/*
> + * Called from setup_arch with interrupts disabled.
> + */
> +void __init efi_enter_virtual_mode(void)
[...]
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -902,6 +902,10 @@ static noinline void __init kernel_init_freeable(void)
> smp_prepare_cpus(setup_max_cpus);
>
> do_pre_smp_initcalls();
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT))
> + efi_enter_virtual_mode();
The comment for the efi_enter_virtual_mode() function says "called from
setup_arch with interrupts disabled". None of these are true for the
call above (and I would really prefer an arch call than this arm64
conditional call in init/main.c.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists