linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 19/27] iommu/exynos: add support for power management subsystems.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:07:57 +0900
From:	Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@...sung.com>
To:	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
Cc:	Linux ARM Kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux DeviceTree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Samsung SOC <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com>,
	Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Prathyush <prathyush.k@...sung.com>,
	Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@...sung.com>,
	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Varun Sethi <Varun.Sethi@...escale.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 19/27] iommu/exynos: add support for power management
 subsystems.

On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:33:04 +0100, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On 18.03.2014 12:23, Cho KyongHo wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 17:07:53 +0100, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >> Hi KyongHo,
> >>
> >> On 14.03.2014 06:10, Cho KyongHo wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> >>> @@ -677,11 +679,40 @@ static int __init exynos_sysmmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>    	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
> >>>
> >>>    	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> >>> +	data->runtime_active = !pm_runtime_enabled(dev);
> >>
> >> Hmm, this seems to be a bit misleading. The field is named
> >> runtime_active, but the assignment makes it true if PM runtime is _not_
> >> enabled (i.e. inactive). Is this correct?
> >>
> >
> > I agree that it may lead misunderstood.
> > data->runtime_active actually indicates if electric power is asserted
> > to the System MMU. pm_runtime_enable() call must enable runtime pm
> > for the given device. If runtime pm is not enabled although pm_runtime_enable()
> > is called, CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is not configured.
> >
> > Actually, it is replacible with
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME))
> >      data->runtime_active = true;
> 
> I would keep it as !pm_runtime_enabled(dev), but rename the field to 
> something more meaningful, like data->is_powered_on.
> 

That is good idea.

thanks for advice.

KyongHo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/