[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1395266717.12479.293.camel@snotra.buserror.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:05:17 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc 32: Provides VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 22:52 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> This patch provides VIRT_CPU_ACCOUTING to PPC32 architecture.
> Unlike PPC64, PPC32 doesn't provide the PACA register. Therefore the
> implementation is similar to the one done in the IA64 architecture.
> It is based on additional information added to the Task Info structure.
PACA isn't a register -- just a convention for how Linux uses a GPR.
Maybe it's time to use it on PPC32 as well?
> Index: b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> ===================================================================
> --- b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c (revision 5607)
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c (revision 5608)
> @@ -167,6 +167,10 @@
> DEFINE(TI_PREEMPT, offsetof(struct thread_info, preempt_count));
> DEFINE(TI_TASK, offsetof(struct thread_info, task));
> DEFINE(TI_CPU, offsetof(struct thread_info, cpu));
> + DEFINE(TI_AC_STAMP, offsetof(struct thread_info, ac_stamp));
> + DEFINE(TI_AC_LEAVE, offsetof(struct thread_info, ac_leave));
> + DEFINE(TI_AC_STIME, offsetof(struct thread_info, ac_stime));
> + DEFINE(TI_AC_UTIME, offsetof(struct thread_info, ac_utime));
Doesn't this need to be protected by #ifdef
CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE?
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> DEFINE(DCACHEL1LINESIZE, offsetof(struct ppc64_caches, dline_size));
> Index: b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h
> ===================================================================
> --- b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h (revision 5607)
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h (revision 5608)
> @@ -43,6 +43,12 @@
> int cpu; /* cpu we're on */
> int preempt_count; /* 0 => preemptable,
> <0 => BUG */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE
> + __u32 ac_stamp;
> + __u32 ac_leave;
> + __u32 ac_stime;
> + __u32 ac_utime;
> +#endif
This isn't uapi; why not use "u32"?
Plus, it should be made clear that this is only used on 32-bit.
> struct restart_block restart_block;
> unsigned long local_flags; /* private flags for thread */
>
> @@ -58,6 +64,8 @@
> .task = &tsk, \
> .exec_domain = &default_exec_domain, \
> .cpu = 0, \
> + .ac_stime = 0, \
> + .ac_utime = 0, \
Also needs to be ifdeffed -- which isn't going to work in a macro, so
maybe remove the ifdef from the variable declarations, or just let the
fields be initialized to zero by default. Or add PACA to 32-bit. :-)
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists