linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc 32: Provides VIRT_CPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1398833787.31586.8.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:56:27 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
Cc:	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc 32: Provides VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING

On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 17:05 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 22:52 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > This patch provides VIRT_CPU_ACCOUTING to PPC32 architecture.
> > Unlike PPC64, PPC32 doesn't provide the PACA register. Therefore the
> > implementation is similar to the one done in the IA64 architecture.
> > It is based on additional information added to the Task Info structure.
> 
> PACA isn't a register -- just a convention for how Linux uses a GPR.
> Maybe it's time to use it on PPC32 as well?

PACA is actually a data structure and you really really don't want it
on ppc32 :-) Having a register point to current works, having a register
point to per-cpu data instead works too (ie, change what we do today),
but don't introduce a PACA *please* :-)

> 
> > Index: b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c	(revision 5607)
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c	(revision 5608)
> > @@ -167,6 +167,10 @@
> >  	DEFINE(TI_PREEMPT, offsetof(struct thread_info, preempt_count));
> >  	DEFINE(TI_TASK, offsetof(struct thread_info, task));
> >  	DEFINE(TI_CPU, offsetof(struct thread_info, cpu));
> > +	DEFINE(TI_AC_STAMP, offsetof(struct thread_info, ac_stamp));
> > +	DEFINE(TI_AC_LEAVE, offsetof(struct thread_info, ac_leave));
> > +	DEFINE(TI_AC_STIME, offsetof(struct thread_info, ac_stime));
> > +	DEFINE(TI_AC_UTIME, offsetof(struct thread_info, ac_utime));
> 
> Doesn't this need to be protected by #ifdef
> CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE?
> 
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> >  	DEFINE(DCACHEL1LINESIZE, offsetof(struct ppc64_caches, dline_size));
> > Index: b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h	(revision 5607)
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h	(revision 5608)
> > @@ -43,6 +43,12 @@
> >  	int		cpu;			/* cpu we're on */
> >  	int		preempt_count;		/* 0 => preemptable,
> >  						   <0 => BUG */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE
> > +	__u32 ac_stamp;
> > +	__u32 ac_leave;
> > +	__u32 ac_stime;
> > +	__u32 ac_utime;
> > +#endif
> 
> This isn't uapi; why not use "u32"?
> 
> Plus, it should be made clear that this is only used on 32-bit.
> 
> >  	struct restart_block restart_block;
> >  	unsigned long	local_flags;		/* private flags for thread */
> >  
> > @@ -58,6 +64,8 @@
> >  	.task =		&tsk,			\
> >  	.exec_domain =	&default_exec_domain,	\
> >  	.cpu =		0,			\
> > +	.ac_stime =	0,			\
> > +	.ac_utime =	0,			\
> 
> Also needs to be ifdeffed -- which isn't going to work in a macro, so
> maybe remove the ifdef from the variable declarations, or just let the
> fields be initialized to zero by default.  Or add PACA to 32-bit. :-)
> 
> -Scott
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/