[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <532A2DEF.9040101@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 02:53:19 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
CC: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2a RESEND 2/2] of_mdio: Allow the DT to specify the phy
ID and avoid autoprobing
On 03/20/2014 01:36 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>> The preferred multi-line comment style is:
>>>> /*
>>>> * bla
>>>> * bla
>>>> */
>>> Sergei, the entire file use the 'net' multi-line commenting style, and
>>> I have maintined that consistency with the new code.
>> No, you haven't followed the networking style. It is:
>> /* bla
>> * bla
>> */
>> while your comment used:
>> /* bla
>> * bla */
> Oh Ok - but the latter is the used by the majority of pre-existing
> comments..
> I thought the convention on stuff like this was to stick with the
> existing style?
Hardly so when there's preferred one, described in CodingStyle.
> Do you think it is worth a v4? If so, which style is appropriate?
> There is one other pre-existing comment that uses net.
Well, use the net style then. I don't see significant difference between
it and the "default" preferred style.
> Regards,
> Jason
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists