[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140319223633.GC1154@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:36:33 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2a RESEND 2/2] of_mdio: Allow the DT to specify the phy
ID and avoid autoprobing
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 02:20:11AM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 03/20/2014 01:14 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> >> The preferred multi-line comment style is:
>
> >>/*
> >> * bla
> >> * bla
> >> */
>
> >Sergei, the entire file use the 'net' multi-line commenting style, and
> >I have maintined that consistency with the new code.
>
> No, you haven't followed the networking style. It is:
>
> /* bla
> * bla
> */
>
> while your comment used:
>
> /* bla
> * bla */
Oh Ok - but the latter is the used by the majority of pre-existing
comments..
I thought the convention on stuff like this was to stick with the
existing style?
Do you think it is worth a v4? If so, which style is appropriate?
There is one other pre-existing comment that uses net.
Regards,
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists