lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140320104855.GA16285@zion.uk.xensource.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:48:55 +0000
From:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
To:	Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
CC:	<ian.campbell@...rix.com>, <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jonathan.davies@...rix.com>,
	Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 9/9] xen-netback: Aggregate TX unmap
 operations

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:16:05PM +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm thinking about revoking this patch: it's value is pretty small,
> but it causes performance regression on Win7 guests. And probably it
> is not the best solution for this problem. It might be the delay it
> takes the dealloc thread to be scheduled is enough.
> What do you think?
> 

Can you elaborate? What makes Win7 so special? What's performance
impact to other guests?

Wei.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ