lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:14:51 +0000
From:	Paul Durrant <>
To:	Wei Liu <>, Zoltan Kiss <>
CC:	Ian Campbell <>,
	Wei Liu <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"Jonathan Davies" <>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v7 9/9] xen-netback: Aggregate TX unmap

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wei Liu []
> Sent: 20 March 2014 10:49
> To: Zoltan Kiss
> Cc: Ian Campbell; Wei Liu;;
>;; Jonathan Davies;
> Paul Durrant
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 9/9] xen-netback: Aggregate TX unmap
> operations
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:16:05PM +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm thinking about revoking this patch: it's value is pretty small,
> > but it causes performance regression on Win7 guests. And probably it
> > is not the best solution for this problem. It might be the delay it
> > takes the dealloc thread to be scheduled is enough.
> > What do you think?
> >
> Can you elaborate? What makes Win7 so special? What's performance
> impact to other guests?

It won't be Win7 specifically I expect. It will likely by any version of Windows, or any other OS that limits the TXs-in-flight so aggressively. Basically you need to TX-complete reasonably frequently otherwise your throughput drops off a lot. IIRC at Solarflare we found every ~500us to be just about frequent enough for hitting 10G.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists