[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1395316090.7776.24.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 04:48:10 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
computersforpeace@...il.com, kernel@...inux.com,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
angus.clark@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Remove useless consts from
function arguments
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 11:41 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 11:11 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Reported-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> >
> > Why are these useless?
> >
> > Even if the object code produced is the same,
> > these serve as information to the human reader
> > about how the arguments are used.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/20/69
>
>From that email:
suggestion:
const uint8_t *const buf => const uint8_t *buf
const uint32_t size => uint32_t size
const uint32_t offset => uint32_t offset
What was done:
-static int stfsm_write_fifo(struct stfsm *fsm,
- const uint32_t *buf, const uint32_t size)
+static int stfsm_write_fifo(struct stfsm *fsm, uint32_t *buf, uint32_t size)
Note the removal of the const from uint32_t *buf
Why?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists