[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOCHtYjtOdAMwjmC8_1Mm2jqHK3ah3Ra3j0+xxesy0VYkYB7OQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:15:25 -0500
From: Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...il.com>
To: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: tda998x: Fix lack of required reg in DT documentation
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:31:10 +0000
> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> 1. change the DT compatible strings the driver has to accept both
>> nxp,tda19988 and nxp,tda19989, and set the appropriate device
>> in the DT file (tda19988). I'm a bit nervous about using
>> "nxp,tda1998x" in case we're clashing with devices with different
>> characteristics.
>
> The Cubox is sold with either the TDA19988 or the TDA19989 (I don't
> know about the AMX33XX boards). Then, setting the exact type in the DT
> would ask for 2 differents DTs or for having two tda998x definitions in
> a same DT...
fyi:
On the AM335x (BeagleBone Black), the NXP's chip ink shows, 88BHN so TDA19988
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists