[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140320151934.GV7528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:19:34 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: tda998x: Fix lack of required reg in DT
documentation
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 03:59:35PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:31:10 +0000
> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > 1. change the DT compatible strings the driver has to accept both
> > nxp,tda19988 and nxp,tda19989, and set the appropriate device
> > in the DT file (tda19988). I'm a bit nervous about using
> > "nxp,tda1998x" in case we're clashing with devices with different
> > characteristics.
>
> The Cubox is sold with either the TDA19988 or the TDA19989 (I don't
> know about the AMX33XX boards). Then, setting the exact type in the DT
> would ask for 2 differents DTs or for having two tda998x definitions in
> a same DT...
I'm not saying that it has to match the physical device fitted - I'm
merely suggesting not using nxp,tda1998x which could (and as Sebastian
has found, does) conflict with other devices with different properties.
We still auto-detect the exact device type by reading the ID register
because that's the most reliable way to detect exactly what kind of
device is fitted to the board.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists