linux-kernel - [PATCH 6/7] gpio: dwapb: use a second irq chip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 22 Mar 2014 17:16:43 +0100
From:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:	atull@...era.com
Cc:	linus.walleij@...aro.org, gnurou@...il.com,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dinguyen@...era.com, delicious.quinoa@...il.com,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] gpio: dwapb: use a second irq chip

Right new have one irq chip running always in level mode. It would nicer
to have two irq chips where one is handling level type interrupts and
the other one is doing edge interrupts. So we can have at runtime two users
where one is using edge and the other level.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
index 752ccb1..3c9cdda 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
@@ -192,6 +192,8 @@ static int dwapb_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type)
 		break;
 	}
 
+	irq_setup_alt_chip(d, type);
+
 	writel(level, gpio->regs + GPIO_INTTYPE_LEVEL);
 	writel(polarity, gpio->regs + GPIO_INT_POLARITY);
 	irq_gc_unlock(igc);
@@ -207,7 +209,7 @@ static void dwapb_configure_irqs(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
 	struct irq_chip_generic	*irq_gc;
 	unsigned int hwirq, ngpio = gc->ngpio;
 	struct irq_chip_type *ct;
-	int err, irq;
+	int err, irq, i;
 
 	irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
 	if (!irq) {
@@ -221,7 +223,7 @@ static void dwapb_configure_irqs(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
 	if (!gpio->domain)
 		return;
 
-	err = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(gpio->domain, ngpio, 1,
+	err = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(gpio->domain, ngpio, 2,
 					     "gpio-dwapb", handle_level_irq,
 					     IRQ_NOREQUEST, 0,
 					     IRQ_GC_INIT_NESTED_LOCK);
@@ -242,17 +244,28 @@ static void dwapb_configure_irqs(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
 	irq_gc->reg_base = gpio->regs;
 	irq_gc->private = gpio;
 
-	ct = irq_gc->chip_types;
-	ct->chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
-	ct->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
-	ct->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
-	ct->chip.irq_set_type = dwapb_irq_set_type;
-	ct->chip.irq_enable = dwapb_irq_enable;
-	ct->chip.irq_disable = dwapb_irq_disable;
-	ct->chip.irq_request_resources = dwapb_irq_reqres;
-	ct->chip.irq_release_resources = dwapb_irq_relres;
-	ct->regs.ack = GPIO_PORTA_EOI;
-	ct->regs.mask = GPIO_INTMASK;
+	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
+
+		ct = &irq_gc->chip_types[i];
+		ct->chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
+		ct->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
+		ct->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
+		ct->chip.irq_set_type = dwapb_irq_set_type;
+		ct->chip.irq_enable = dwapb_irq_enable;
+		ct->chip.irq_disable = dwapb_irq_disable;
+		ct->chip.irq_request_resources = dwapb_irq_reqres;
+		ct->chip.irq_release_resources = dwapb_irq_relres;
+		ct->regs.ack = GPIO_PORTA_EOI;
+		ct->regs.mask = GPIO_INTMASK;
+
+		if (i == 0) {
+			ct->type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK;
+			ct->handler = handle_level_irq;
+		} else {
+			ct->type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH;
+			ct->handler = handle_edge_irq;
+		}
+	}
 
 	irq_set_chained_handler(irq, dwapb_irq_handler);
 	irq_set_handler_data(irq, gpio);
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/