[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAVeFu+WQCpo=LEZqdAhpMcO1PLqUzfcVKTafnwe=BiLGLjFZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:17:40 +0900
From: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: atull@...era.com, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dinguyen@...era.com, delicious.quinoa@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] gpio: dwapb: use d->mask instead od BIT(bit)
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> d->mask contains exact the same information as BIT(bit) so we could save
> a few cycles here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> index 3c9cdda..ebfcf5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static void dwapb_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
>
> irq_gc_lock(igc);
> val = readl(gpio->regs + GPIO_INTEN);
> - val |= BIT(d->hwirq);
> + val |= d->mask;
> writel(val, gpio->regs + GPIO_INTEN);
> irq_gc_unlock(igc);
> }
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static void dwapb_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d)
>
> irq_gc_lock(igc);
> val = readl(gpio->regs + GPIO_INTEN);
> - val &= ~BIT(d->hwirq);
> + val &= d->mask;
Shouldn't that be ~d->mask here?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists