[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53303DD8.6010906@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 10:14:48 -0400
From: Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
CC: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jonathan Austin <Jonathan.Austin@....com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Use 64-bit DMA addresses for LPAE+VirtIO-MMIO
On 03/21/2014 07:27 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On 21 Mar 2014, at 19:44, Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> On 03/21/2014 12:27 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 05:35:19PM +0000, Christopher Covington wrote:
>>>> On an LPAE system, the physical addresses used by VirtIO-MMIO may
>>>> be larger than 32 bits, even if the header and configuration space
>>>> addresses fit into 32 bits. For example with the Versatile Express
>>>> memory map using 4G memory, the following error occured when trying
>>>> to use a VirtIO-MMIO block device.
>>>>
>>>> EXT2-fs (vda): error: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory #2: :
>>>> unaligned directory entry - offset=0, inode=3755990991, rec_len=57311,
>>>> name_len=223
>>>>
>>>> To fix this, select ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT when both LPAE and
>>>> VIRTIO_MMIO are selected.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/mm/Kconfig | 1 +
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
>>>> index 1f8fed9..a62bcc9 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -617,6 +617,7 @@ config ARM_LPAE
>>>> bool "Support for the Large Physical Address Extension"
>>>> depends on MMU && CPU_32v7 && !CPU_32v6 && !CPU_32v5 && \
>>>> !CPU_32v4 && !CPU_32v3
>>>> + select ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT if VIRTIO_MMIO
>>>
>>> That's the wrong place to enable ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT. Do you have a
>>> platform with >32-bit physical address space? If yes, it should be
>>> selected there.
>>
>> The platforms I'm currently using are models like the Versatile Express
>> RTSM/FVP. I can respin with changes to ARCH_VEXPRESS and ARCH_VIRT instead.
>
> But do you use RAM beyond 32-bit on such models?
Yes. On the Versatile Express memory map only 2G RAM is 32-bit accessible, and
I'm using 4G as I tried to note in the commit message.
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0575h/Bbajihec.html
(For reference, the device tree I'm passing the A32 kernel is
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rtsm_ve-aemv8a.dts.)
Christopher
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by the Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists