linux-kernel - Re: patch fix for intel sdd s3500 series on Sil3512 controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140324141558.31c169cf@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
Date:	Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:15:58 +0000
From:	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	"David F." <df7729@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: patch fix for intel sdd s3500 series on Sil3512 controller

On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:32:54 -0700
"David F." <df7729@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> It appears if nIEN is set all polling type IO fails.   After an
> attempt, future non-polled communications also fails.  This patch
> allows it to work.  Not sure if any spin lock protection would be
> needed or the system already handles the device existence for the
> generated irq with polling enabled.  handler already ignored irq if
> queued command was polling type.

Does it behave plugged into a different controller without the hacks ?

Alan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/