[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140324154806.GB2775@8bytes.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:48:06 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: suravee.suthikulpanit@....com
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kim.naru@....com, jay.cornwall@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] iommu/amd: Fix logic to determine and checking max
PASID
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:54:18PM -0600, suravee.suthikulpanit@....com wrote:
> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
>
> In reality, the spec can only support 16-bit PASID since
> INVALIDATE_IOTLB_PAGES and COMPLETE_PPR_REQUEST commands only allow 16-bit
> PASID. So, we updated the PASID_MASK accordingly and invoke BUG_ON
> if the hardware is reporting PASmax more than 16-bit.
>
> Besides, max PASID is defined as ((2^(PASmax+1)) - 1). The current does not
> determine this correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
> Tested-by: Jay Cornwall <Jay.Cornwall@....com>
Applied, thanks.
Btw, is there any publicly available driver/way/whatever for me to test the
AMD IOMMUv2 code paths?
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists