[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADmjqpMqdN0kRA3ee9D8NkDHGrMcXPJKn9XYj+nXp8yYhqH1=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:35:55 +0200
From: Stratos Karafotis <skarafotis@...il.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tick: fix spelling mistake in tick_handle_periodic()
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> One of the comments in tick_handle_periodic() had 'when' instead of 'which' (My
> guess :)). Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
> kernel/time/tick-common.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
> index 20b2fe3..791a3a2 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ void tick_handle_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev)
> * to be sure we're using a real hardware clocksource.
> * Otherwise we could get trapped in an infinite
> * loop, as the tick_periodic() increments jiffies,
> - * when then will increment time, posibly causing
> + * which then will increment time, posibly causing
Also, on the same line
s/posibly/possibly
Stratos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists