| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:09:18 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: tglx@...utronix.de Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, skarafotis@...il.com, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> Subject: [PATCH V2] tick: fix spelling mistake in tick_handle_periodic() One of the comments in tick_handle_periodic() had 'when' instead of 'which' (My guess :)). Fix it. Also fix spelling mistake in 'Possible'. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> --- V1->V2: Fix spelling mistake of possible as well. kernel/time/tick-common.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c index 20b2fe3..0fec634 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ void tick_handle_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev) * to be sure we're using a real hardware clocksource. * Otherwise we could get trapped in an infinite * loop, as the tick_periodic() increments jiffies, - * when then will increment time, posibly causing + * which then will increment time, possibly causing * the loop to trigger again and again. */ if (timekeeping_valid_for_hres()) -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists