[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wqfhoqk3.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 15:34:52 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools, perf: Allow the user to disable time stamps
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> writes:
>>
> But getting the mmaps at the right moment is crucial for some apps
> especially if address space is recycled otherwise symbolization
> may be incorrect.
Yes that is why it is only an option and not default.
You need to know what you're doing.
BTW I think the recycle case is not very likely on non JIT.
>> You're right for some special analysis it matters, that is why
>> it is only an option.
>>
>> But for the standard "only care about perf report and
>> don't care about about program startup" case it's a nice saving.
>>
> How do you know in advance you won't need mmap ordering?
When I measure a long running process and I know it doesn't
fork/dlopen/jit. Using --initial-delay also helps to skip
the startup phase or attaching later.
I believe it's actually a good choice for most non
forky workloads. But yes it cannot be made default.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists