[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201403260442.42970.marex@denx.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 04:42:42 +0100
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Yao Yuan <yao.yuan@...escale.com>
Cc: "wsa@...-dreams.de" <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] i2c: add DMA support for freescale i2c driver
On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 at 04:08:27 AM, Yao Yuan wrote:
[...]
> > > + i2c_imx->use_dma = false;
> > > + } else if (i2c_imx_dma_request(i2c_imx, (dma_addr_t)phy_addr)) {
> > > + dev_info(&pdev->dev,
> > > + "can't request dma chan, faild use dma.\n");
> > > + i2c_imx->use_dma = false;
> > > + } else {
> > > + i2c_imx->use_dma = true;
> > > + }
> >
> > Can you not just check if i2c_imx->dma is valid pointer or NULL pointer ?
> > Then you won't need a separate variable, for this purpose ... right ?
>
> Sorry and I think what I know is just to check whether it is NULL.
> Then for the second question, maybe there are some other ways, But I think
> it is more tidy and easier understanding for using a separate variable,
> for this purpose.
You are just wasting space and duplicating data, unless I am wrong.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists