[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cd88de7e04734400b897c0e2bcf07eab@BL2PR03MB338.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 05:56:34 +0000
From: Yao Yuan <yao.yuan@...escale.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
CC: "wsa@...-dreams.de" <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/2] i2c: add DMA support for freescale i2c driver
On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 at 11:43:27 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 at 04:08:27 AM, Yao Yuan wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > + i2c_imx->use_dma = false;
> > > > + } else if (i2c_imx_dma_request(i2c_imx, (dma_addr_t)phy_addr))
> {
> > > > + dev_info(&pdev->dev,
> > > > + "can't request dma chan, faild use dma.\n");
> > > > + i2c_imx->use_dma = false;
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + i2c_imx->use_dma = true;
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > Can you not just check if i2c_imx->dma is valid pointer or NULL
> pointer ?
> > > Then you won't need a separate variable, for this purpose ... right ?
> >
> > Sorry and I think what I know is just to check whether it is NULL.
> > Then for the second question, maybe there are some other ways, But I
> > think it is more tidy and easier understanding for using a separate
> > variable, for this purpose.
>
> You are just wasting space and duplicating data, unless I am wrong.
>
Well, Do you have a better idea? Although I think it's necessary.
Best regards,
Yuan Yao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists