[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5333C315.3000405@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:50:05 +0530
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com, mgorman@...e.de,
ak@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: move FAULT_AROUND_ORDER to arch/
On Tuesday 25 March 2014 11:06 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:20:15PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>> Kirill A. Shutemov with the commit 96bacfe542 introduced
>> vm_ops->map_pages() for mapping easy accessible pages around
>> fault address in hope to reduce number of minor page faults.
>> Based on his workload runs, suggested FAULT_AROUND_ORDER
>> (knob to control the numbers of pages to map) is 4.
>>
>> This patch moves the FAULT_AROUND_ORDER macro to arch/ for
>> architecture maintainers to decide on suitable FAULT_AROUND_ORDER
>> value based on performance data for that architecture.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h | 6 ++++++
>> arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h | 5 +++++
>> include/asm-generic/pgtable.h | 10 ++++++++++
>> mm/memory.c | 2 --
>> 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> index 3ebb188..9fcbd48 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> @@ -19,6 +19,12 @@ struct mm_struct;
>> #endif
>>
>> /*
>> + * With a few real world workloads that were run,
>> + * the performance data showed that a value of 3 is more advantageous.
>> + */
>> +#define FAULT_AROUND_ORDER 3
>> +
>> +/*
>> * We save the slot number & secondary bit in the second half of the
>> * PTE page. We use the 8 bytes per each pte entry.
>> */
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> index 938ef1d..8387a65 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> @@ -7,6 +7,11 @@
>> #include <asm/pgtable_types.h>
>>
>> /*
>> + * Based on Kirill's test results, fault around order is set to 4
>> + */
>> +#define FAULT_AROUND_ORDER 4
>> +
>> +/*
>> * Macro to mark a page protection value as UC-
>> */
>> #define pgprot_noncached(prot) \
>> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
>> index 1ec08c1..62f7f07 100644
>> --- a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
>> @@ -7,6 +7,16 @@
>> #include <linux/mm_types.h>
>> #include <linux/bug.h>
>>
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Fault around order is a control knob to decide the fault around pages.
>> + * Default value is set to 0UL (disabled), but the arch can override it as
>> + * desired.
>> + */
>> +#ifndef FAULT_AROUND_ORDER
>> +#define FAULT_AROUND_ORDER 0UL
>> +#endif
>
> FAULT_AROUND_ORDER == 0 case should be handled separately in
> do_read_fault(): no reason to go to do_fault_around() if we are going to
> fault in only one page.
>
ok agreed. I am thinking of adding FAULT_AROUND_ORDER check with
map_pages check in the do_read_fault. Kindly share your thoughts.
With regards
Maddy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists