[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <533B95F6.2010303@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 10:15:42 +0530
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com, mgorman@...e.de,
ak@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: move FAULT_AROUND_ORDER to arch/
On Tuesday 25 March 2014 11:20 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 03/25/2014 10:36 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Fault around order is a control knob to decide the fault around pages.
>>>> + * Default value is set to 0UL (disabled), but the arch can override it as
>>>> + * desired.
>>>> + */
>>>> +#ifndef FAULT_AROUND_ORDER
>>>> +#define FAULT_AROUND_ORDER 0UL
>>>> +#endif
>> FAULT_AROUND_ORDER == 0 case should be handled separately in
>> do_read_fault(): no reason to go to do_fault_around() if we are going to
>> fault in only one page.
>
> Isn't this the kind of thing we want to do in Kconfig?
>
>
I am still investigating this option since this looks better. But it is
taking time, my bad. I will get back on this.
With Regards
Maddy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists