linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 20:34:39 +0800
From:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>
CC:	"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

On 2014-3-27 19:12, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Hanjun,
> 
> On 25/03/14 11:09, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> Hi Sudeep,
>>
>> On 2014-3-25 18:00, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> Hi Hanjun,
>>>
>>> On 25/03/14 09:00, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>> After commit 74397174989e5 (arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries),
>>>> I still get a duplicate Power management options section in linux-next
>>>> git repo, may be due to some merge conflicts, anyway, fix that in this
>>>> patch.
>>>>
>>> I reported this and Mark Brown posted the patch[1].
>>> I assumed it is already pulled, but looks like that's not the case.
>> [...]
>>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314472.html
> 
> [...]
> 
>> here is the link:
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>
> 
> Just had a look at the linux-next tree and looks like the original commit:
> "cpufreq: enable ARM drivers on arm64" is pulled by both Catalin and Rafael
> which has resulted in the fixup patch[1] not removing the duplicate entry
> cleanly.
> 
> If not too late it better to ask either Rafael or Catalin to drop both patches
> from their tree, instead of creating 4 patches in total to enable cpufreq :)

Rafael is on vacation now.

Catalin, could you please handle this?

Thanks
Hanjun

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/