linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:18:43 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Cc:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

On Thursday, March 27, 2014 08:34:39 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2014-3-27 19:12, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > Hi Hanjun,
> > 
> > On 25/03/14 11:09, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >> Hi Sudeep,
> >>
> >> On 2014-3-25 18:00, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >>> Hi Hanjun,
> >>>
> >>> On 25/03/14 09:00, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >>>> After commit 74397174989e5 (arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries),
> >>>> I still get a duplicate Power management options section in linux-next
> >>>> git repo, may be due to some merge conflicts, anyway, fix that in this
> >>>> patch.
> >>>>
> >>> I reported this and Mark Brown posted the patch[1].
> >>> I assumed it is already pulled, but looks like that's not the case.
> >> [...]
> >>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314472.html
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> >> here is the link:
> >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> >>
> > 
> > Just had a look at the linux-next tree and looks like the original commit:
> > "cpufreq: enable ARM drivers on arm64" is pulled by both Catalin and Rafael
> > which has resulted in the fixup patch[1] not removing the duplicate entry
> > cleanly.
> > 
> > If not too late it better to ask either Rafael or Catalin to drop both patches
> > from their tree, instead of creating 4 patches in total to enable cpufreq :)
> 
> Rafael is on vacation now.
> 
> Catalin, could you please handle this?

Well, not really, I'm at a conference now.

Anyway, I'd rather not drop anything, but if you send me a revert, I can apply it.

Thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/