[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140327150328.GB18563@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:03:28 +0100
From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@...il.com>,
ingo.tuchscherer@...ibm.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans-Georg Markgraf <MGRF@...ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Greg Price <price@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/03]: hwrng: create filler thread
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:47:31PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 03/26/2014 06:11 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > Also, in the /dev/random sense,
> > most hardware RNGs have no entropy at all, since they're likely to be
> > FIPS-approved DRBGs that don't have a real non-deterministic source.
>
> Such a device has no business being a Linux hwrng device. We already
> have a PRNG (DRBG) in the kernel, the *only* purpose for a hwrng device
> is to be an entropy source.
That's also my understanding. The shot noise from a Schottky-diode seems
to be quite popular, for example.
> TPMs, in particular, should almost certainly be massively derated based
> on what little we know about TPM.
Backdoors, anyone? :-)
Torsten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists