linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.c fix a sparse warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140328032844.GC2263@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 20:28:44 -0700
From:	Jimmy Li <coder.liss@...il.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Teodora Baluta <teobaluta@...il.com>,
	Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
	Michael Gunselmann <michael.gunselmann@...dium.uni-erlangen.de>,
	Lisa Nguyen <lisa@...apiadmin.com>,
	Martin Hofmann <martin.hofmann@...dium.uni-erlangen.de>,
	Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@...il.com>,
	Tülin İzer <tulinizer@...il.com>,
	Archana kumari <archanakumari959@...il.com>
Cc:	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.c fix a sparse warning

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:42:43AM -0700, Jimmy Li wrote:
> fix a sparse warning.
> drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.c:1846:35: warning: cast from restricted
> gfp_t
> drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.c:1846:35: warning: incorrect type in
> argument 2 (different base types)
> drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.c:1846:35:    expected restricted gfp_t
> [usertype] flags
> drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.c:1846:35:    got int [signed] <noident>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jimmy Li <coder.liss@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.c
> index ac3fc16..5e25535 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.c
> @@ -1843,7 +1843,7 @@ int iwctl_siwencodeext(struct net_device *dev,
>  	PRINT_K("SIOCSIWENCODEEXT...... \n");
>  
>  	blen = sizeof(*param);
> -	buf = kmalloc((int)blen, (int)GFP_KERNEL);
> +	buf = kmalloc((int)blen, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (buf == NULL)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	memset(buf, 0, blen);
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 

You are right, I found that variable buf also don't make sense here,
maybe this could be more clear.

    param = kzalloc(sizeof(struct viawget_wpa_param), GFP_KERNEL);
    if (param == NULL)
        return -ENOMEM;

removing two unnecessary variable, buf and blen.

In this situation, I should send a new patch v2 for it base on the
previous path? or send a new patch include all changes?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/