lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 3 Apr 2014 12:04:51 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <>
To:	Jimmy Li <>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,
	Teodora Baluta <>,
	Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <>,
	Michael Gunselmann <>,
	Lisa Nguyen <>,
	Martin Hofmann <>,
	Malcolm Priestley <>,
	Tülin İzer <>,
	Archana kumari <>,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.c fix a sparse warning

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:28:44PM -0700, Jimmy Li wrote:
> You are right, I found that variable buf also don't make sense here,
> maybe this could be more clear.
>     param = kzalloc(sizeof(struct viawget_wpa_param), GFP_KERNEL);
>     if (param == NULL)
>         return -ENOMEM;
> removing two unnecessary variable, buf and blen.
> In this situation, I should send a new patch v2 for it base on the
> previous path? or send a new patch include all changes?

We throw away the original patch and you send a v2.  Use the subject:

[PATCH v2] drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.c fix a sparse warning

Under the Signed-off-by line put:
Signed-off-by: you
v2: additional cleanups as well.

dan carpenter

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists