lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1395995486.9520.2.camel@linux-fkkt.site>
Date:	Fri, 28 Mar 2014 09:31:26 +0100
From:	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
To:	Roger <rogerable@...ltek.com>
Cc:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
	Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org, wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn,
	micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] mfd: Add realtek USB card reader driver

On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 11:33 +0800, Roger wrote:
> On 03/26/2014 10:36 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 18:44 +0800, rogerable@...ltek.com wrote:
> >> From: Roger Tseng <rogerable@...ltek.com>

> >> +	if (ret)
> >> +		goto out_init_fail;
> >> +
> >> +	/* initialize USB SG transfer timer */
> >> +	init_timer(&ucr->sg_timer);
> >> +	setup_timer(&ucr->sg_timer, rtsx_usb_sg_timed_out, (unsigned long) ucr);
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> >> +	intf->needs_remote_wakeup = 1;
> >
> > Why?
> Our reader supports remote wake-up from card slot event(insertion, 
> removal). It should be enabled to let the driver be able to detect the 
> newly inserted card.

Interesting. This capability has been lacking for a long time.
That is cool hardware. Are you sure the upper layers implement
the event infrastructure so that devices are not polled?

> The LED is not in a permanent cut-off state after here. It is called to 
> guarantee the LED is off during suspend to save more power. It could be 
> lit up in the card host drivers(e.g. rtsx_usb_sdmmc.c) anytime whenever 
> necessary.
> 
> This has been asked may times. I'm considering putting some comment in 
> next revision.

Good idea.

	Regards
		Oliver


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ